Two Empires, Two Kings

There are several similarities as well as differences between the Assyrian Empire as well as Hammurabi’s empire in Northern Mesopotamia. One of the similarities is the strength in military. It is clear in Hammurabi’s empire that his growing military after each city-state conquest added to his militaristic power and reign, as well as induced fear amongst other city states and protected him from their attack. In terms of the Assyrian Empire, their empire also grew as a result of neighboring empires that were threats to them, but eventually would be defeated as well. Just like Hammurabi took in city-states, by annexing them, or ruling over them directly or indirectly, the Assyrian empire and its growing influence did not allow the independence of many neighboring states. One major difference that is apparent between the two empires is the way in which the kings are represented and remembered as. In Mieroop’s writings, it is clear that he remembers Hammurabi in only positive lights. There is no light shed on his negative influences or deeds, and as a result it is a very biased biography. Assyrian kings are remembered as more merciless, harsh, and tyrannical. One way that this is apparent is in the fact that the city states that are taken under Assyrian Kings control must abide by the current king’s values, traditions, and laws instead of being able to keep their own culture, identity, and independence (in some way).