In chapter 3, Liverani discusses the importance of the production of barley and wool in facilitating urban development and pushing the economy. Although the historical details may not be accurate or reliable, Liverani explains that the administrators used almost slave-like methods to exploit the laborers into working to produce barley and wool. He even calls it "forced labor" and says that they were only paid for by food rations (38). The shepherds who were given the task of supervising the sheep were forced to follow strict quotas and did not make much profit for themselves. To me it seems as though this city did not have a fair "social contract" in which the citizens were voluntarily participating in helping the city, and in return getting protection, rights, and livelihood. The rulers of Uruk appears to have exploited their citizens in order to trade with neighboring cities such as Anatolia to increase its own wealth.
Although historical evidence is very difficult to confirm especially for events that happened such a long time ago, the discrepancy between the first two chapters of the book and chapter 3 really confused me and have left me with a negative perception of the city of Uruk.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.